Saturday, December 20, 2008

Loudoons 5 steps to prevent your child from joining the Jihad.

After receiving so many heart felt cries from parents concerned that their children have been caught up in the jihad epidemic sweeping this lawless unsmacked nation following the revelations by National Business Reviews Editor and Chief Neville Gibson, that activism leads to Jihad, we here at the Loudon Institute for Moral Parenting knew we had a job to do to help parents prevent this tragedy happening.

Here is our quick 5 steps to prevent your child from joining the Jihad.

Step 1: Learn to spot the pre-signs of Jihad. This could be the movies they are watching, do they watch too many documentaries vs Hollywood blockbusters. This could be a sign that Jihad is building in your child. Your task as a parent is to ban educational documentaries, ban the watching of certain liberal shows like On the Matt, The Daily Show and other shows that lead to Jihad.

Step2: Begin surveillance on your children. Without being too over the top, hidden video cameras, paid informants are just two tools that will assist you in seeing jihad coming before its too late.

Step3: Talk regularly to your children about why they should be eating meat and destroying the environment. Spank any child (in love) that shows pre-signs that they may respect the environment and animals.

We need our children to understand that we need to eat animals because of the whole Cain and Abel sacrifice thing in the bible, and we know what happened to Cain the vegetarian...he became a terrorist jihadist.

Step 4: Identify the signs of Jihad. This could be a Che Guevara teeshirt, for boys it could be a lack of interest in guns, bombs and violence, for girls it could be a desire to not shave their armpits, wear perfume or go mall shopping. Once your child begins to show these signs, its pretty much a give in that they will be heading up the Kyber Pass into terror training in Hindu Kush.

Step 5: Act, once you have singled out the children that are beyond help, quickly have them shipped off to military school for retraining, at the very least, ring your local Precrimes Office and dob your child in.

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Neville the winner Gibson on Snails and Jihad: (One of Trevor's mates)

Neville Gibson goes head to head with Matt McCarten on TV3's On The Matt debate show.

Like Trevor Loudon, Neville Gibson believes that society needs the Special Intelligence Group, whose task is to chase terrorists, to be spying on our local jihadist the 'snail people'.

Like Trevor Loudon, Neville Gibson believes the Special Intelligence Group should continue to place informants into activist groups, whose job is to both gather intelligence on and also incite these activists to break the law.

We at New Zeel remember the days when entrapment used to be quite the unpopular thing to do, but these days, anything goes...according to Gibson, what these snail lovers need is a little push, and people like police informant Rob Gilchrist are just the tonic needed to push them into Jihad.

Anyways Neville Gibson explains to us the unwashed the pathway that is mapped out for anyone wanting to take protest action against big business. Watch and be amazed.

Neville Gibson everyone! The so called impartial editor of the National Business Review....What a wanker!

Sunday, December 14, 2008

Trevor Loudon admits to supporting Communist China styled surveillance techniques

Loudon's recent confession that he supports the NZ growing authoritarian regimes tactics that have been levelled against leftist political dissidents will come as little surprise to those of us who have been monitoring his gradual admission that deep down he supports the use of political and military tactics used by his favourite Libertarian, the Late General Pinochet, and his favourite enemy, Communist China, on activists in this country that do not support his liber-terror-ian extremist views.

'Augusto' was famous for two things, implimenting Libertarian economic reform ideology at the end of a gun, and the suppression of leftist groups. When we say 'suppression', we mean the 2279 leftist activists whose bodies were never found. To add to that were the findings of the Valech Report that 30,000 political dissidents had been tortured by the worlds first Libertarian Government.

Too add to that winning start, two of Loudons heroes, McCain and Friedman both pandered to Pinochet, paying him visits during his reign of terror adding support to the notion that Libertarianism will lead to another round of fascism.

So these next comments by Loudon come as little surprise concerning the revelations that the Special Intelligence Group are monitoring leftist activists.

Loudon States:

I thoroughly approve of the police action here.

Words that will come back to haunt Loudon as he revells in the latest revelation of police authoritarianism?

We shall wait and see.

Sunday, November 30, 2008

Obama File 54467: More exclusive evidence Obama is a Cylon

They say a picture paints a thousand words. Well we here at the Loudoon Institute for the Propagation of Red Dawn Paranoia give you two thousand words.

If these images have not convinced you why we should live in fear of this cylon loving, lollypop, candyflossed looking wouldn't-hurt-a-fly nerd then you are a communist and a lover of Satan.

The redman is the president of New Zeeland now people, you should learn to live in fear like we all do here at Loudoon Estates. Get them bars on the windows, buy M16 assault rifles, stock up with Ayn Rand audio tapes and get to living isolated, its just a matter of time before the paratroopers come from the sky to force us into hippy leftist dope smoking love making.

Previous image found on Google exposed the new President as the 12th Cyclon:

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Breaking News: Obama is a ......

So far in my google expose I have been able to uncover the following information about the anti-christ that has taken power in our fatherland, the USA.

- Firstly Obama is supported by every marxist extremist group in the USA from Al Qaeda, the Bolsheviks, radical librarians through to the Nation of Islam, of course, worst of all is the support coming from all those slimey green peace activists.

To Date:
- I exposed the fact that he was groomed for this role of terror from birth, born in a red testtube of communism, breast fed by Siberian wolves and raised by anarcho-maoists to think he is a democrat whilst his groomers implanted secret code words into his mind to be activated as soon as he assumes power.

But our latest intel, and this is a New Zeel exclusive, is that the newly elected president is in fact a cylon mole! Do pray tell you say, what proof have you that this be the case, well look and be amazed.

This image was found on Google, Google being the central 'tool' we use for our 'indepth research on radical organisations...'

As you well know, anything found through Google must be true.

This model of cylon has been embedded into the presidential race, preprogrammed once power is seized to immediatly order tactical nuclear strikes on anyone not supporting socialism or not found wearing a Che Guevara teeshirt.

All I can say is head for the hills people, I myself have bought a tin hat AND are wearing it!!! Do anything, rather than sit around watching me take a beating online for losing the war against the first black president.

Thanks to All Those Who Fought

The Free World is suffering with over-glee from the Obama win in the US elections two nights ago.

(A picture paints a thousand words)
To the absolute disgust of the McCarthyists, Senator Al Qaeda Trotski Satan Bin Obama took power through what some have called a LANDSLIDE poll result.

It is clear that the McCain/Palin/FoxNews combo were not able to use Trevor Loudons myriad of mudslinging blog articles, articles which Loudon has toiled over tirelessly for the last year, to dissuade voters from supporting Obama.

Not to be outdone by FoxNews, and in the face of failure, Loudon rose from the ashes this morning to further describe terror loving Obama as one that has,

"The sewage of slum lords, communist sympathizers and domestic terrorists swirl about his ankles."

Sour grapes? Or is Trevor Loudon truly a prophet of doom for the democrats because they chose not just a black man but an articulate one, to trick the nation into voting them into power?

Or is Loudon finally fallen into acute paranoid schizophrenia wallowing in self pity and pent up racial tension?

The trick now for Loudon is two fold. Firstly to bombard his blog with countless quoted posts from other righties whose asses are also severely reemed, and two, get back to bashing the Maori's. Oh dear, looks like we are right on both counts....

See: for a New Zealandised rendition of everything you see on the extremist right wing FoxNews channel.

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Obama File 4829: Commies Will BrainWash You

With the building communist onslaught of the Obama campaign and the ramifications to subsidiary countries of the USA like New Zealand, its time for us to reflect on some wisdom from a bigone era that is still relevant to all McCarthiest today.

Communists and Socialists are devising clever and insidious new plans (like giant photos of Stalin) to lull our youth (particularly the pre-pubescent, clean-cut crowd) into a suggestive state of CommieReceptiveness (generally noted by a slow and repetitive nodding motion).

Friday, August 15, 2008

Barack Obama-My Part in His Downfall-So Far

For the last several months, I have been working with a team of US google researchers, investigating the far left background of US presidential hopeful, Barack Obama by exclusively searching google our secret weapon against red devils.

Left Rahowa Nazi Guy, second left Augy Pinochet, Lotha Von Trotha, right, Trevour Loudoon.

The story of my involvement in this story goes back to the when Google first came onto the interweb thing.

I found that like previous presidents who enjoyed the support of the the right wing Klu Klux Klan, Obama had his supporters on the extreme left as well...namely the RED DEVILED COMMIES.

Consequently I put a lot of research into the special tricks you can use when searching google, like putting the parenthesis around search terms like "Obama commie devil", or adding the + symbol to make sure certain words turn up in a search, like +Obama +communist +devil. The search results showed 356,000 pages of results thus proving his links to communist terror.

356,000 pages linking Obama to terror is more linking than the Urewera 16/17/18/19/20 who we all know wore teeshirts with either Marcos or Guevara on them thus linking them directly to Al Qaeda.

We all know that gruesome discovery that proves without a doubt Obama's links to terror, and that being the Che Guevara poster that was spotted on the wall of his campaign office. I know, absolutely unrefuteable evidence.

This combined with the Google results show without a doubt his strong ties to terror and hippy love triangles, probably even worse, he probably prefers organic bread and the commie inspired free range eggs.

But the most damning of evidence that I have uncovered which links Obama directly to Communism and Satanism is this image also found on Google.

Obama making the sign of Satan

I think the image speaks for itself.

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

NZ industry front group rears its ugly head

We give the StandoverGroup website 7/10 in the pisstake stakes.

From their website...

"An exclusive alliance of big businesses resolutely committed to the financial wellbeing of their stakeholders, the Standover Group works tirelessly to show the Government that less, not more regulation is not just the right way, but the only way to secure immediate prosperity for important business players."

"We recognise that an economy is like a pyramid of champagne flutes, and that only by filling up the vessel at the apex can wealth trickle down to those on the lower echelons.

Because of this, we believe that the greater good is serviced by first and foremost taking care of those – such as our members - at the pyramid’s zenith. Movers and shakers should not be encumbered with burdensome legislation and oppressive taxation, it’s as simple as that.

We know that our wealth offers unparalleled leverage over any government that fails to adopt our policies for responsible management of the economy."

Monday, April 14, 2008

While we wait

It is looking like its going to be a few more months before Trevor Loudon can get back to the keyboard...

We are assuming there is no internet access where he is currently....or else there would be more additions to his weblog.

So while we wait, we thought we'd pick up the slack and post an article or two mentioning the words communism and terror.

Heres the first one.

Sunday, March 30, 2008

Signing Off For a While....

It's been fun....taking the piss out of idiot-boy Loudon...but hes out of the ACT VP job now, so that makes it rather boring and in some strange way we feel our job is done here, so we're going to get back to some good old fashioned tree huggin, jumbo bin raidin', seed eatin', revolutionary lovin', hippy livin' for a bit... hope you all enjoyed it as much as we have.

Last but not lest, we'd like to sign off saying,

"Loudon, get help man, you're a nutter. Soviet styled communism is finished, move on...."

Revolutionarily Yours
Trevour Loudoon Crew (See below)

Comrade Gunny Sgt Hartman
Comrade Dr Evil
Comrade Bill Hicks
Comrade Emma Goldmyn
Comrade Pokey

and Comrade Satan (from whence communism sprang from)

Monday, March 24, 2008

Trevor Loudon Too Right Wing For ACT?

News is filtering out from a closed session at ACT HQ that Loudon has been given the arse from his Vice Presidents position for being too much of a right wing nut case even for ACT.

…not that we really give two shakes of a donkey's ass about ACT or even who is the next neoliberal to take his place, its just a small priceless piece of nemesis for those many with whom that scumbag blog trash has defamed as a means to exercise his a cronic case of acute Mccarthyism.

From Eternal Sunshine of the Ideologically Freehold

...while his dedicated hatred of socialists has its uses, it is a distraction that does not need to hang around the Act leadership. Rodney has done well at purging the spirit of Donna. Last thing Act needs is to be portrayed as a far-right gestapo party. In a closed session of Act's AGM, Trevor Loudon was replaced and Gary Mallett was re-selected as president. Good.

Added: Trevor Loudon has come back from licking his wounds to post this in response to these rumours of him getting the arse, in doing so confirmed much of what is being said on the gonzofreakpower Blog

First-I did not "lose" my position as ACT VP. My two year term came to an end and I chose not to re-stand....I was at the AGM-closed only to non ACT members. There were several dozen party members present. The very able Michael Crozier was elected to the position in the normal manner.

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Chernobyl Orchestrated to Convince NZ to Stay Nuke Free

The Spy Who Shagged Us
With the latest subterfuge styled 70's anti-communist demagogy riddled exposé by Trevor Loudon and his secret squirrel buddy Bernard Moran, that those dastedly slippery Soviets through their number one spy Austin Powers Van De Ven, duped New Zealander's into our anti-nuclear stance by what must be considered the largest public mind fuck since minds existed...

Considering the fact that not only were 78% of New Zealanders against nuclear powered ships entering our waters, they were against nukes up to 10 years before Van De Ven began his project of mass manipulation - must have been tachyonic mass hypnotism, it must then follow on that the Soviets had to have orchestrated the Chernobyl disaster as a final nail in the coffin of any free-trade agreement with the U.S and a parting of ways with ANZUS....

....You see Loudon can argue till he is blue in the face as to who may or may not have influenced the anti-nuclear movement, but what he cannot deny is was the disaster in 1986 at Chernobyl that really set this country's anti-nuke stance....not only into legislation in 1987, but firmly into concrete in what is one of only a few uniquely New Zealand cultural beliefs this country can be proud of.

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

No Trade For Oil Men

National has come out gunning for the free-trade deal, but ACT however have remained fairly cool on their response to Chinese Government atrocities committed in Tibet and to the pending coined free trade agreement.

In the past various ACT members have said that a free-trade agreement with China could be a good thing. Various members of ACT also supported other totalitarian regimes too like Augusto Pinochet's Chilean junta who tortured 30,000 people and thousands of others were either killed or went missing, never to be seen again.

A poll run on the ACT Party website a whiles back showed that around 60% 0f ACT supporters agreed to the idea of a FTA with China. When Prebble was running the show he was in full support of the idea of an FTA with China, in fact encouraging Labour to sign an agreement with China.

Hyde has said before that he believed that free trade is good for New Zealand in reference to the impending FTA with China.

Well we know that idiot-boy Loudon hates all the tea in China because of the red devil commies that ran/run the place... So while he is would be for a free trade deal with pretty much any totalitarian genocidal Government, it would depend on whether said Government were red star wearing filthy commies or get his tick of approval? We say we don't give a flying shit what the bent of the regime is, genocide is genocide.

Friday, March 14, 2008

A Vote for ACT is a Vote for Rogernomics and Ruthanasia

Yes folks, Roger Reagan Douglas will be standing in an electorate seat and is keen to get on with the job he failed to complete under Labour.

Today he released his repackaging of the same old tired bullshit, calling it "Vision without limits" he laid out his new plan to overtake the Australian economy by 2020. Fortunately one of the key factors to the full implementation of any such devastating economic reforms would be that ACT be the Governing party, which by the looks of the polls, would require odds larger than that which brought about evolution.

So lets take a look at what is Rogernomics. What do we know about this political ideology.

Rogernomics: "...cutting agricultural subsidies and trade barriers, privatising public assets and the control of inflation through measures rooted in monetarism"

What is monetarism? Well its an economic theorem based on the, 'Quantity Theory of Money' which was developed by Simon Newcomb, Alfred de Foville, Irving Fisher, and Ludwig von Mises, later to be ripped off by ultra right free-market nazi Milton Friedman.

Rogernomics supporters saw the layoffs of 87,000 workers in the late 80s as necessary evil for right wing libertarian (U.S version of) economic reforms, many of these same people also saw Pinochet's totalitarianism as necessary to bring about said reforms in Chile, case in point - Trevor Loudon.

One of the reasons totalitarianism would be necessary to Rogernomic libertarians in today's climate is due to globalisation. If say NZ was to convert to a full blown U.S styled libertarian economy employing the invisible hand as a check and balance to prevent say monopolies from forming, what is then stopping another country or external corporation with the means and capacity to buy New Zealand out several times over with their chump change, from doing so.

Can you depend on inter country agreements to prevent mega corporations from doing so, when it is the power of central government, now largely diminished, in fact the whole premise of a country would be largely irrelevant that currently is the preventer.

What you end up with is the same scenario that Trotsky surmised about. The need for the spread of their 'ism' to other countries, in order to ensure the validity of the invisible hand as a check and balance. In Trotsky's era that meant adjoining countries, but in todays economic and geopolitical climate and conditions, geography is irrelevant.

The U.S version of Libertarianism is still a theory yet to be proven, and we all know that people support the idea of free trade until a competitor comes along and cleans up, then corporations will bandy together to create a quasi-state federations in an attempt to protect their assets and profit margins, and you are all back to square one, except of course with a corporately elected state.

Big corporate giants don't give a rats ass about U.S styled libertarianism unless it can make them more profit and the workers are not particularly interested in the political meanderings of their bosses. This type of Libertarianism has not taken history into account, is not based on reality, but on a set of fantasies of middle management and small businessmen set about to grant themselves unrestricted access to a bigger market and to expand their fledgling businesses into unaccountable corporations.

And the person to open those doors for them, their economist Saviour, is Roger Douglas with his sidekick list of small businessmen and raft of delusional economic reforms in tow.

Thursday, March 13, 2008

Finally Exposed! Who Was REALLY Behind NewZeal

In his latest attempt for credibility, Trevor Loudon has tabled his paranoia into an article that Investigate Magazine has released.

See: Finally Exposed! Who Was REALLY Behind NZ's Anti-Nuclear Stand?
RED SQUARES The untold story behind New Zealand’s ANZUS breakdown

New Zealand’s break with the US over nuclear warship visits in 1985 has become an iconic symbol of Kiwi independence. In this new investigation, however, BERNARD MORAN and TREVOR LOUDON argue the New Zealand politicians became pawns in a much bigger game, a game they were unaware of...

Whoa backup....Bernard Moran?


Bernard Moran:
A freelance journalist by training Bernard has a long association with the military, serving in the UK and Europe as well as with the New Zealand Army in the Intelligence Corps. A director of Trinity Associates, an information research firm, he brings 20+ years of journalistic field investigative skills grounded in military intelligence experience. He has built an extensive network throughout the Pacific Basin and is well 'connected' in the United States as well. Bernard is a member of 'Sub Rosa' the Military Intelligence Association as well as many other professional associations. Skills include country studies, security assessment and information collection.

Sounds like a spy to you?

Monday, March 10, 2008

Philippine Government takes its lead from Loudonism?

Philippine Government has followed in the footsteps of Trevor Loudon by listing any critic of its ideology of oppression as terror suspects . Several New Zealanders appear on both the temporary Philippine Government blacklist and Trevor Loudon's Blacklist including Jane Kelsey.

Of no surprise is the omission by Loudon of this sentence from his quote from Pinoypress:

The Philippines government should stop blacklisting peaceful critics and banning them from entering the country, Human Rights Watch said today.

As usual everyone else is aware that the list is merely suppressing the entry of anyone that would criticise and expose the Philippine Government's use of death squads and summary executions, everyone else in the world can clearly see the bigotry naming dissidents as Al Qaeda terrorists...everyone except of course for you guessed it...

Further Reading

- See also: Scared Silent
Link to the: Report

- NGO fears impact of gov't's counter-insurgency programs on Lumads

- Death squads spare no one in the Philippines
Since President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo came to power in 2001, Philippine human rights organizations counted already more than 700 extra-judicial killings. Death squads are targeting progressive activists and leaders of people's organizations but even health workers are not spared. This is the testimony of a staff of one community based health program...

Dangerous Regime, Defiant People - KARAPATAN 2007 Human Rights Report
THE YEAR 2007 is a dangerous time for the Filipino people as state terror, impunity in human rights violations and general lawlessness grip the nation. The government of Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo has done little to stop the political killings and disappearances except take token steps to assuage local and international outcry. On the other hand, the year also signals victories in the people’s relentless struggle against political repression and state terrorism as the victims’ clamor for justice and democracy is echoed here and abroad.

There is no clearer picture of the Arroyo government’s iron-fist mindset and utter disregard for human rights than the sight of full-battle-geared policemen and an armored personnel carrier smashing into a tear-gassed hotel lobby to “serve an arrest warrant” to a handful of rebel soldiers and civilians, and afterwards, police
herding in the journalists and broadcasters covering the incident, their wrists strapped, like suspected criminals.....

Sunday, March 9, 2008

And the Libertarian of the Year Award goes to....

Viktor Bout
Viktor Bout believes in freedom with Corporational responsibility. His ideal society is one in which government is slashed to the bone and corporations are free to reach their potential.

According to the Observer: The war between Israel and Hizbollah was three days old when American intelligence spotted a bear-sized man with a moustache and hangdog face meeting high-ranking Hizbollah officials in a safe house outside Beirut.

With Israeli F-16s roaming the skies above the city and military commanders growing increasingly desperate to find and kill high-value Hizbollah targets, the sighting should have been a watershed moment.

Those high-ranking Hizbollah officials, it is now widely believed, were, in all probability, meeting the man who apparently supplied them with their high-tech weapons: Viktor Bout, the world's biggest arms dealer.

It was, it appears, another close escape for the man known as the "Merchant of Death", who had spent more than a decade fuelling wars across the world by being able to deliver weapons to anyone, anywhere, at almost any time. And that might not have been his greatest talent, for he also had shown an uncanny ability for avoiding arrest, despite having Interpol, the United Nations and half a dozen nations' intelligence services tracking his empire of air cargo transports and weapons delivery services.

Read the full report in the NZ Herald

Trev is back

Not that we missed him, but while he was away at Kyle Chapman's 'survival camp' it gave us the needed time to get in a bit of composting, build a stirling engine which runs on heat from the sun and of course, endless sessions of anarcho lovemaking-to-u-drop.

Now lets see, whats the latest from the pro-Bush Loudon.....ok...hmmm....yeeeep a concoction of the usual, commies are everywhere....Al-Qaeda has set up a base in the Urewera to teach acid-Jazz Jewish music....oh ok here we go, heres one...

Top Chavista To Visit New Zealand

Pro-slaughter of the Palestinians, Mah666 says:
A member of the Left's favorite warmongering neo-Communist state in Latin America is in New Zealand. Will these "peace activists" protest Chavez's warmongering rhetoric toward Colombia over the death of Raul Reyes, member of FARC?

Gee I thought it was the INVASION OF ECUADOR by the Columbian military that lead to the tensions between Columbia and Venezuela....seems I was wrong.

I also thought that there was a difference between warmongering rhetoric and.....I dunno....actually going to fucken war, but no, according to 'Death to all Palestinians' Mah666 there isn't.....

...oh shit! Venezuela restores Colombian diplomatic ties ...oh well never mind Trevvy-poos, no Stalinist war this week.

Tuesday, March 4, 2008

UN Observer says govts are using terror

UN Observer says govts are using terror to instill fear in communities - From Scoop

Prof. Hans Koechler paid a visit to Auckland recently to deliver lecture on ‘The Global War on Terror - Contradictions of an Imperial Strategy'. He is President of the International Progress Organisation (IPO) and a renowned international jurist, activist expert on international law, injustice, and power politics, academic and much-published progressive author:

Dr Koechler's clear perceptions on the subject assume greater relevance here now, following the terror raids, arrests, and mass intimidation of Tuhoe last October; and the subsequent Law Commission review now underway of NZ's criminal and terrorist legislation.

Since 1972, UN Secretaries-General in their statements subsequently acknowledged Professor Köchler’s contributions to international peace. In April 2000, Secretary-General Kofi Annan appointed Professor Koechler as international observer at the Scottish Court in the Netherlands (Lockerbie Trial) which to this day remains unresolved largely due to the non-compliance of the British government in releasing the supposedly secret information to the court.

Darpan-The Mirror: Dr. Hans Koechler, welcome, welcome to Aotearoa. Thank you for being willing on your holiday to spend some time sharing your knowledge with us. You have talked tonight about the global war on terror-what is it new about terror and terrorism in the current context?

Prof. Koechler: The new feature is that a kind of universal threat is now being connected to the term terrorism and fear is being instilled into the people because they are make believe that there is a threat to our western civilization even to the very survival of the western community and to the preservation of the identity that is emanating from this kind of illusive enemy which is called international terrorism. That I think is the new feature because in earlier decades, in earlier eras, terrorists acts were specified and people identified certain-the interests coming from certain specific groups but now apparently this danger is somehow general and vague and entire civilizations are presented as a threat to our own civilization.

Darpan-The Mirror: So who is promoting this and why?

Prof. Koechler: As far as I can see it is promoted by the establishment, powerful political and economic establishment, media establishment in the leading countries of the western world. On top of them first and foremost is the United States of America and in addition for instance the United Kingdom of Great Britain and the Northern Island and some other Western allies.

Darpan-The Mirror: And what do they have to gain from this?

Prof. Koechler:Well, frankly speaking, it is about the global power in a situation in which there is no challenge to the Western supremacy and particularly in which there is no real threat to the security of the Western world. I mean after the demise of communists, after the collapse of the Soviet block; apparently one feels the need to create another enemy stereotype which will allow to somehow justify certain measures of control over the rest of the world. Usually a government needs an enemy; people have to be rallied around the government in defence against an enemy from outside and this threat or the other which is now supposedly threatening the west is presented as terror- or as terrorism or as the terrorists.

Darpan-The Mirror: You described it as self-defeating; why do you think it is self defeating?

Prof. Koechler: It is finally doomed to fail because it necessitates a constant a kind of perpetual mobilisation of the people and of the resources of a country. When you present the threat as universal and when there is no possibility to identify specifically certain groups from which the threat emerges, you have to engage in a total of strategy of prevention and you have to exclude even the slightest possibility of attack from whichever direction and that means you have to be prepared 24 hours seven days a week hundred percent. And for that reason somehow the …somehow the…strength or the capacities of the countries that engage in such an undertaking will be exhausted and the other reason why I think this is in the medium and long term is a self-defeating exercise.

And the other reason is this kind of strategy antagonizes entire nations and even peoples and civilizations in such a way that they will not feel any loyalty towards those countries that engage in that struggle and they may challenge the supremacy of those countries and they may be more determined in their resistance than they otherwise would be, if there would be a kind of rational relationship on the basis of the definition of mutual interest, as also could be the case.

Darpan-The Mirror: Why have politicians, political leaders, intellectual leaders in so much of the west not challenged? You gave the example of the Japanese member of the senate who had raised issues and those issues had not appeared in the mainstream media. What- Why do you think that is occurring?

Prof. Koechler: I personally feel on the basis of my own experience now over several decades having dealt with issues particularly of the Middle East of the Muslim world that most of the people in the media and in the academic community are just afraid for their own position. They do not want to somehow be marginalized or that they do not want to be sidelined which would be the case if they speak out critically against this entire strategy. So it is a kind of opportunism or the kind of fear which people are not able to overcome because very often if one really speaks out, one is confronted with quiet strong media campaigns and the careers of some people might suffer if they do speak out.

Darpan-The Mirror: But if we contrast that to the civil rights campaigns and the challenges that there were to the suppression of rights during the 1960’s, 1970’s in the West- we are now seeing a revisiting of the normalization, militarization, of suppression of fundamental rights. What’s different? Why are we seeing those voices of dissent now?

Prof. Koechler: I think that as far as Europe is concerned, then I am only an expert on these matters; in Europe as far as Europe is concerned the entire social climate if one may use that term, is different compared to the 1960’s and also our students in universities nowadays are much less outspoken and are much more obedient so to speak as far as the politically correct opinions are concerned. But maybe the situation now has to do with a kind of overall opinion control or fear that has been instilled into the people and no one dares to be or doesn’t want to be disloyal towards his community or wants to speak out against the supplementary soft state.

Darpan-The Mirror:So how would you relate this to that of Palestine? We have seen the stories of killings and maiming everyday; we have seen the depravation of basic necessities of life- of access to electricity and to water and food? How do you interpret or analyze the situation in Palestine and the responses to it within the framework of your thinking?

Prof. Koechler: As far as I understand that I have followed the developments in Palestine since 1970’s and that means it’s now more than three decades, as far as I see it, most of what you refer to now, most of the events are not adequately presented to the wider public; most of the people would just not know what is really going on, the news’ are filtered through the corporate media, if people would really be aware of the situation…people live…under which people live in for instance the Gaza strip, there would be some stronger and critical position against the policies for instance of the western countries. But as far as I see it, there is a lack of…lack of comprehensive information and the other problem as far as Palestine is concerned is that is this linkage with Islam as a threat and particularly terrorism-the linkage of Islam and terrorism.

Darpan-The Mirror:So when you are looking at the way the western states respond to the use of force to suppress resistance movements, freedom fighters, terrorists however they are defined by one side or the other. What are the factors that you think drive the decisions of states now can I put that in the local context…

Prof. Koechler:Yeah.

Darpan-The Mirror: Our government here for example had no problem with recognizing the General who lead the coup in Thailand. The military government there and the government here was perfectly happy to deal with, had no problem in dealing with Musharraf in Pakistan; Bainimarama the leader of the military coup in Fiji is ostracized, there are sanctions against anyone in the military including one who wanted to come here in January whose family members were part of the military, what are the kinds of considerations do you think that drive the differential responses of the western leaders to regimes that are actually very similar in their particular style and in the suppression of rights attached to it?

Prof. Koechler:I would use the term of “the policy of double standards”. A government applies certain principles of legality or certain criteria of the rule of law selectively according to the specific constellation of interest. And so it is no surprise to me, of course I am not aware of the specific policies of the government here, but it is of no surprise to me to see that the government applies certain principles or insists on the implementation of certain principles in one case and totally overlooks them. Of course in the neighbourhood there may be different interests…and different from which your country may have…that explains…why one insists on certain rules in this case and does not insists on certain rules in other cases. Of course, that creates a credibility problem but I do not know...frankly speaking upto the present moment I do not know of any government which really would be consistent in the application of principles and which would avoid in its foreign policy the so-called policy of double standards.

Darpan-The Mirror: The New Zealand government has also made great play out of the fact that it did not join the coalition of the willing in the invasion of Iraq but it’s there in Afghanistan; Does that sound a convincing clean hands kind of principled approach to you or do you have problems with that kind of differentiation?

Prof. Koechler: In terms of legal doctrines, I would say I would have problems with this kind of differentiation but one could say first of all the government of New Zealand made a good decision in not sending troops to Iraq may of the government that joined the coalition of the willing regret this by now and some have already withdrawn their troops. So the government here was lucky in having not fallen into that trap but as far as new principles are concerned in my view the interventions in both countries Iraq and as well as in Afghanistan are a violation of sovereignity of those countries and both interventions are not duly justified or legitimized by international law; even in the case of Afghanistan there is no authorization of the intervention by American and NATO forces in that country.

Darpan-The Mirror: So do you think International law has become so devalued that it is no longer actually defendable in many of those instances or do you think it is a recoverable concept that might still have some value if it can be removed from the grip of the Security Council?

Prof. Koechler: I don’t know. Eventually it may already be beyond repair so to speak. The big problem I see it that in a situation in a global constellation in which there is no balance of power there is absolutely no incentive for the hegemonial country to abide by the rule of law or to obey the law.

There is no incentive for instance for that country to respect Security Council resolutions, on other way because of the veto this country like for others can block any decisions by that Council at any moment. But as far as Afghanistan is concerned the situation went even that far that for instance my own country the Republic of Austria which according to its constitution is permanently neutral according to the Swiss model.

Even my country has sent forces though in a very small number but sent forces to Afghanistan. Of course people say that this is not compatible with the statutes of permanent neutrality. Can be? It never can be compatible but these things happen now and one is just reinterpreting terms according to the constellation, political constellation of interest at a given moment.

Darpan-The Mirror: So what’s your sense of what might happen in Iran? What are your fears what might happen?

Prof. Koechler: I did fear that the United States together with their ally in the Middle East plus one or two European countries might militarily intervene in Iran and that was according to my knowledge… also the plan of the United States administration two years year ago.

What I see now is the inter-actions services of that very country have expressed an opinion that is contradicting the strategy of the President of the United States. So now my hope is that the US is reconsidering its war plans against Iran and that it will not attack Iran because it will totally destabilize not only the situation in the Middle East but the situation far beyond that region.

Darpan-The Mirror: You stressed a lot on the foreign policy in ideological and the economic interests are also integral to this not only in the Middle East but in the way many economies are now becoming almost dependent on perpetual certainly many aspects of the economy are; Fiji where you are going to go tomorrow the Fiji economy is dependent on remittances; almost 90% of remittances are coming from the security workers that are operating in Iraq; you have an economy that becomes dependent on war and when people come back and bringing the militarization back into the country itself, do you see any similar kinds of militarization of economy within Europe and America that might want to keep perpetuating this process?

Prof. Koechler: As far as Europe is concerned I do not yet see that tendency firmly established. In United States it appears obvious to me that there is a kind of self-perpetuating situation and that’s the economic interests that lead to the involvement of the country into military adventures. As far as our countries in the European Union are concerned I think we are not yet reached that stage…the military industry in most of the European countries is much less strong and much less developed than it is in the United States.

Darpan-The Mirror: Just one last question…we become aware that terrorism has become a domestic issue in this country with the arrests that were in part under the Terrorism Suppression Act with most of those arrested being Maori Sovereignity activists. Do you think the global war on terror is actually having an internal dimension that legitimizes the use of state power against its own dissident internal factions as much as against the other in the global context? And how in that sense do you think we might connect the domestic realities to the international experiences?

Prof. Koechler: I am in this country only since very short time so I am not so familiar with the internal political situation however I do hope that a distinction will be made between tensions that may exist domestically and the international issues related to the so-called global war on terror. As of the present moment I do not see any connection between what is going on here between the government and the representatives of the native population of New Zealand and the war on terror. And just hope that no one will exploits this extremely emotional climate surrounding the global war on terror for internal domestic politics or for internal security measures. One thing…the one situation is to be totally kept separate from the other.

Darpan-The Mirror: Thank you very much for your time. We wish you safe travel and we look forward to having you back here again before July. Thanks!

Prof. Koechler: You are welcome!

Sunday, March 2, 2008

Is Trevor Loudon off to FEMA training camp

When it comes to the likes of Trevor Loudon and the secret intelligence groups like the NZ Combined Threat Assessment Group, you are dealing with highly politically fueled and extremely paranoid delusional people who constantly equate any political dissent with terrorism.

To give you some idea here is a small clip of similar groups in the USA, in this case members of FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) who tasks are the following:

The primary mission of the Federal Emergency Management Agency is to reduce the loss of life and property and protect the Nation from all hazards, including natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters, by leading and supporting the Nation in a risk-based, comprehensive emergency management system of preparedness, protection, response, recovery, and mitigation.

But as you can see from the video, they have a more sinister brainwashing agenda reminiscent of those found in this country's top spy echelons and not surprisingly, also at New Zeal.

Trevor off for a week of revitalisation?

Last month Loudon asks the following question:

Are Marxists Mental? Are Lefties Loony? Are Anarchists Addled? Are Socialists Psychotic? Are Pinkos Peculiar?

Loudon asks this question in an attempt to smear his political enemies, but really is this something he should be asking himself, because we think this is some sort of subconscious attempt by Loudon to reach out for help as he slips further and further into paranoid delusions.

Considering his recent display of Obama-phobia reaching psychotic proportions with a record of 20 consecutive blogs to date, almost converting his desperate blogspot into an exclusive anti-Obama campaign, without even mentioning his abject fear of communist red devils in every corner and shadow, seeking to spring their evil plan for world domination by taking over our libraries....well we think its about time Trev owned up to his illness and submitted himself for a mandatory 7 day mental health assessment.

Perhaps he has taken our advice with his latest delusional and slightly paranoid schizophrenic statement:

Back Soon Freedom Fighters

Blogging off for a while.

Emergency CIA training camp.

I'll be back to the counter-revolution re-energised and re-programmed in a week.

The path to sanity begins with honesty Trevor, this is not a good start.

Who's Responsible For Health Crises?

Are food producers like Trevor Loudon who, in the face of massive evidence to the contrary, continue to use A1 milk in their food products, responsible, or at least should share responsibility for New Zealand's health crisis?

Wouldn't the responsible thing to do by any far right Libertarian conservative wanker, would be to take the initiative and move to A2 milk ingredients? Or are they just happy to wait for the big corporations to move first while 100,000's of New Zealanders die from the affects of beta-casomorphin found in A1 proteins.

You decide...


A1 or A2 milk? Where's the research?

By TIM HUNTER - Sunday Star Times

The following is a summary of New Zealand government-sponsored research, clinical or otherwise, into A1 and A2 milk since July 2004:


Why July 2004? That was when Professor Boyd Swinburn, public health specialist at Deakin University in Melbourne, published a review into existing research on A1 milk and human health risks such as diabetes and heart disease.

Swinburn's study, for the New Zealand Food Safety Authority, said the need for further research was "abundantly clear".

Because of vested commercial interests, he said, "the appropriate government agencies have several important responsibilities in this matter: to support further research in the area (especially clinical research); to clearly communicate the state of knowledge and judged risks to the public; and to take specific actions to promote and protect the health of the public.

"The first two actions are clearly warranted based on the evidence to date."

Most of the milk we drink contains A1 beta-casein, a kind of protein commonly produced by the Friesian cattle breed. The other kind, A2 beta-casein, is more common in Jersey cows, for example. Goats' milk is all A2, as is milk from native Asian cows.

One theory, supported by several research studies but by no means proven, is that A1 milk increases the risk of diabetes and heart disease.

Swinburn's advice that more work was needed seems unequivocal, yet none was done.

The Health Research Council, which manages government investment in public good health research, has funded no studies relating to A1 and A2 milk, ever.

Auckland diabetes specialist Professor Bob Elliott sought Health Ministry approval to fund a repeat of a potentially important animal study, which was later found to be fatally flawed by contaminated feed supplied by the NZ Dairy Research Institute.

The ministry declined to meet the several hundred thousand dollar cost of the project.

The ministry has since approved no further studies and cites the Food Safety Authority as the relevant body, although the FSA has also neither promoted nor funded any scientific follow-up to Swinburn's report.

Food Safety Minister Lianne Dalziel told the Sunday Star-Times on Thursday: "NZFSA has no mandate or facility to sponsor clinical research itself, which is why no further research was undertaken despite the recommendation in the Swinburn report.

"When I was briefed on the A1/A2 milk issue late last year, I felt this was a gap in the process. I believe that any such recommendation should be assessed by health or science and research officials and a decision made about whether further action is required."

Two weeks ago, Dalziel announced a further review of existing scientific studies. This will be done by the European Food Safety Authority after inquiries by New Zealand officials discovered it was also interested in the subject, which neatly flicks the burden of responsibility and funding on to the Europeans.

Dr Murray Laugesen, a public health scientist and co-author of research relating to A1 and A2 milk in 2003, said Dalziel's announcement would achieve little.

"OK, so they do another review of the existing evidence that won't get you anywhere at all. It's like washing the same clothes twice. The main purpose seems to be to get the NZFSA off the hook, to get clarity where clarity is not possible."

The EFSA's conclusions are not expected before the end of this year, but already their value is in doubt. In a January letter to EFSA head Catherine Geslain-Laneelle in Parma, Italy, her New Zealand counterpart Andrew McKenzie advised her to note the Health Ministry's view that "further research, especially independent human trials and animal experimental studies, will be required to definitively identify A1 beta-casein in milk as a risk factor in disease".

Whether the EFSA will come up with definitive results from its review is unclear since so little science has been done in the interim.

But if Geslain-Laneelle, an experienced bureaucrat who speaks three languages, needed guidance, McKenzie advised she read Devil in the Milk, a review of A1/A2 science by Lincoln University professor Keith Woodford.

It was good advice. Woodford's book, published in September, awakened the sleeping giant of controversy over A2 milk with a collection of evidence from more than 100 research papers (Swinburn had reviewed 38).

The issue goes back to the early 1990s, when Elliott got together with dairy industry scientist Dr Jeremy Hill to examine potential links between milk consumption and Type 1 diabetes.

Their hypothesis was that the culprit could be in the beta-casein proteins found in milk. Elliott and Hill's study of international data, funded by Fonterra predecessor the New Zealand Dairy Board, found that the incidence of diabetes and heart disease was correlated with consumption of A1 milk. The correlation is acknowledged by scientists of all stripes to be unusually strong but it does nothing to prove that A1 milk actually causes these health problems.

The latter point is what several scientists have been working on ever since. The evidence to date, as presented by Woodford, suggests it's worth persevering with the effort.

Fonterra did enough work in this area to own important patents around A2 milk and related genetics. The other main owner of patent rights is New Zealand's A2 Corporation, which acquired them from the Child Health Research Foundation a funder of Elliott's research.

However, Hill and Fonterra have since become sceptical of the A2 hypothesis and the giant co-op no longer funds research exploring it.

The dairy industry's position is understandably awkward. If its research found evidence of links between A1 milk and disease, it would be faced with marketing a compromised product while simultaneously promoting its alternative, A2.

Then there is the thorny question of legal risk. If A1 was subsequently shown to be a factor in diabetes, for example, and Fonterra had known about it, the potential costs of legal action would be truly eye-watering.

Furthermore, any general loss of confidence in milk as a source of nutrition could have a significant financial impact on dairy companies and by extension on New Zealand. Fonterra is so big and so important to this country's economy that the repercussions would be felt far and wide.

So its position is naturally one of careful risk management note the science is inconclusive, monitor developments but do nothing to promote further research.

A comment from Fonterra CEO Andrew Ferrier exemplifies this view: "Whenever any new science (both good and bad) about milk and its components is presented we carefully review that science. We have done this on a number of occasions on this issue and found no cause for concern."

Behind the scenes, however, dairy farmers may be heeding Swinburn's advice to consider changing the composition of their herds. Thanks to the industry's work, it is now a relatively simple matter to classify cattle according to A1 and A2 genes.

As Swinburn noted, "a New Zealand dairy herd that produced predominantly A2 milk would have no apparent negative health effects and could potentially have significant population benefits if the A1/A2 hypothesis proved to be correct".

According to cattle genetics specialist LIC, about one million of New Zealand's 3.9 million cows are now A2. The farmer-owned company does not have a view on whether A1 or A2 traits are desirable but said in its spring newsletter that it could respond to market demand for A2 semen within 48 hours.

When the Star-Times spoke to LIC in September its view was that there was sufficient genetic variation within A2 bulls to avoid losing other desirable traits.

The New Zealand herd could be almost entirely A2 in eight to 10 years, it said, and the shift "could be done without compromising other genetic qualities".

Last week LIC's general manager of genetics, Peter Gatley, said the picture was not quite so simple.

"There is always a trade-off," he said. "Any time you require a certain trait you have to let go other genes.

"As we restrict the total gene pool to the third [with A2] you immediately diminish the gene pool. A large diverse gene pool is always a good thing and to make any move to restrict the gene pool is a major step."

So although the move could be made, there is a good reason not to do it if the benefits are uncertain.

In terms of New Zealand's fresh milk supply, milk from one million A2 cows is more than enough to meet local needs if there was any demand for it. Collecting it would require some reorganisation, however, because the animals tend not to be gathered into complete herds.

This country's biggest marketer of A2 milk, Hamilton-based Ridge Natural Foods, has two of its own A2 herds and milks about 180 cows year round. One other local farm supplies Ridge but the company says it needs more.

There are several other herds wholly or nearly 100% A2, but their milk is supplied into Fonterra's pool and not separately marketed.

The question, then, is not whether anything can be done if A1 milk turned out to be a problem there is a clear path towards a solution. The question is whether there is a problem.


- About 80% of the protein in milk is casein, which combines with calcium and phosphate to form molecules giving milk its opaque, white appearance.
- About 35% of the casein is beta-casein, which has three main genetic variants known as A1, A2 and B.
- A2 beta-casein differs from the others in that when digested it does not lead to the release of an amino acid in the body called beta-casomorphin 7 (BCM7).
- BCM7 is known to be an opioid - a type of narcotic - which can have a variety of effects, including suppressing the immune system. Some scientists suspect that BCM7 could cause or aggravate a range of health problems in susceptible people, such as diabetes, coronary heart disease, and autism. Research has found evidence to support these theories, but not enough to be conclusive.
- Milk can be tested to identify A1 or A2 beta-casein, and cattle can be tested to identify whether they carry A1 or A2 genes, or both. Milk in western countries, particularly milk from Friesian cows, tends to be A1.

Friday, February 29, 2008

The Return of Rogernomics

We see the old dog Roger Augusto Pinochet Douglas is back in the saddle. Ready for round two? Perhaps to drag ACT Party vote up to 3-4%, maybe even more...but wait, wasn't Roger Douglas also an avid supporter of the Kohanga Reo? Yet the ACT Party deputy dog Trevor Loudon states:

"In my opinion, the Kohanga Reo and Kura Kaupapa Maori movements are designed to foster a seperatist, radical, even revolutionary culture among young Maori."

What an unholy union...Loudon and Douglas in the same political party.

Mr "I Rogered the workers" Douglas in the founding of the ACT Party, intended to get into power with his own party and finish off what he started under Labour, and to re-jig the parts of Rogernomics that Lange scrapped.

Douglas started ACT not to be a New National nor a lacky to National, but a New Labour based on his and his mothers disillusionment with the Labour Party he was a member of.

Douglas the Accounting Fascist understands quite clearly that there is no real difference between any of the political party's, has stated so in his recent speech in 2006. Yet Loudon tries to convince his readers that Labour, Greens, Maori Party, are some sort of quasi 50s communist conspiracy and that somehow National is the better choice.

Douglas also correctly states, "None of them (political party's) have a clear vision of where New Zealand stands and where it should be heading". But he left out ACT who also fits right into that boat as well with its dreamy ideas of dissolving central Government.

They will learn eventually the lesson that anarchists have learnt the hard way over the past few centuries.....that people in power....

i.e. The sum total of the political, legislative, judiciary, military and financial institutions through which the management of their own affairs, the control over their personal behaviour, the responsibility for their personal safety, are taken away from the people and entrusted to others who, by usurpation or delegation, are vested with the power to make laws for everything and everybody, and to oblige the people to observe them, if need be, by the use of collective force.....

....vehemently dislike having their power dissolved.

Is New Zeal a front for the National Party?

Is New Zeal a front for the National Party?

At New Zeel we like to ask the real questions, and this one was just begging to be asked. First lets begin with a challenge. Todays challenge is to read the following vision statement and from that decide which political party that statement belongs to:

- Limited government
- Personal responsibility
- Equal citizenship and equal opportunity
- Individual freedom and choice
- Strong families and caring communities
- Loyalty to our country, its democratic principles and our Sovereign as Head of State
- National and personal security
- Competitive enterprise and rewards for achievement
- Sustainable development of our environment

Took a minute didn't it. Well it did for us. 'Obviously' it's the National Party vision wonder Dickwad Prebble wanted to merge with National in was obviously just a cost cutting exercise since they are plainly the same party with a different name.

Now lets see what Trevor Loudon claims to believe in:

- I believe in freedom with responsibility, not freedom from responsibility.
- My ideal society is one in which government is slashed to the bone and people are free to reach their potential.

Ok, your typical Libertarian, 'indirect beliefs with no action required', type statement.

Ex-ACT Party Justice Spokesperson and all round wanker Steve Franks cuts right to the chase without batting an eyelid....while also batting for National:

"National is an increasingly active party. Do join as every member will count. If you are in Wellington Central that’s even better as it will help me with selection. Go to and click on Get Involved/Support National or go directly to Join National"

Crikey, is every ex-ACT Party member turncoating to National? Not quite.

One would wonder why, because like all Libertarian / right wing conservatives, they will not only turncoat on their own party, but also on the fundamental policies for which their political parties stand for.

Examples: Both the National and ACT party's policies are fairly anti anything Maori....repeal any legislation that mentions the word "Maori" until they have expunged all traces of Maori from legislation (a bit like various totalitarian dictators in time past who tried to destroy any record of the existence of their predecessors).

That goes without saying, from National to ACT to the Libertarian Party whose members often consider themselves to be anti-indigenous rights campaigners.

Yet which party was in power and assisted the implementation of the following specifically Maori services:

- Kohanga reo
- Kura Kaupapa
- Wananga
- Maori Health Providers
- Maori Social Service Providers

No surprises there, yep the National Party, you guessed correctly again, thats 2 from 2.

Friday, February 22, 2008

Anti Anti-Smacking Bill Petition Doing Well

Yes folks the petition to overturn that Government namby-pamby family interferring bill by Sue Bradford is ahead of schedule.

With one week to go it is time to get that old dusty paddler out of the parlour cupboards and get it warmed up. As you can imagine with 300,000 + signatures, thats a lot of 'catch up' paddling that will be a going on once we rid this country of them there laws.

We need the power back to be able to legally physically brutalise our children with whipping sticks. We need a return to the old days of, "bend over and spread 'em", and take to them with a modified piece of wood without the fear of police slapping us across the wrists and interfering with Gods work.

We need to put in place safeguards so that we will never return to the place we are at now where children are free to be rebellious, where they become open vessels to the demon of rebellion who roams our countrysides wishing to possess their body's and drive them to anarchism and communist pot smoking revolutionary free-love making sessions when they grow up and become adults.

The way our ancestors have beaten off these demons in olden times in Europe and around the world is to take a piece of board, modify it to something close to a baseball bat and beat them chillins around the areas of their sexual organs in order to save their souls from hell as the bible tells us so.

So get them paddlers out of the cupboard and prepare for a change of law.

Discalimer: Always whack your children around their sexual organ areas in love. If questioned about your smacking habits, always say you only ever give out the occasional love taps.

Now get out there and whip little Johnny's ass for Jesus!

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Righties Calling Righties Lefties

As the campaign drags on using the classic con to convince the uninitiated that any bad righties are actually lefties (without specifically saying that of course), one of Trevor Loudons mates, the crazed 'nutter' MAH has come up with this real doozer of a blog.
(Details the linkage between Nazism, neo-Nazism and hardcore Leftism)
Here he tries to convince himself that the National Front are left wing. (I guess his first task should be to try and convince them of that...)

MAH the crazy Zionist states:
It's a Leftist obsession to paint Israel to be a "Nazi"-state, even when those who defend Palestinian terrorists are the closest thing to a neo-Nazi than they are letting on.

Funnily enough, even though we here at New Zeel condemn all terrorism even terrorism committed in the past by Palestinian organisations against Israel, the fact that we listed Israel as a terrorist state drove this deranged Zionist over the edge (see comments).

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

And Now For The News (spoof alert)

Here is a bit of news or comment that NewZeal hasn't made mention of, or perhaps, stayed away from, why, well we shall ask that question later, but first, the news spin.

In a strange but not surprising news today, media report that police pay ransom for return of stolen national treasures. Along with the ransom demands, that of having a remand inmate released on bail, they paid out an undisclosed sum not totaling more than $300,000 dollars of reward money directly to the thieves for the return of the goods, not to someone who offered information that lead to the return of the medals, but to the thieves themselves. That is not to mention the cost of the operation to date being somewhere close to twice that amount in tax payers money.

Full Report from NZ Herald

Now why hasn't NewZeal picked up on this story? I think there is a bit of head burying going on over there, not willing to make the call when it involved something as volatile a subject as war medals and police paying ransom demands, cutting deals with criminals probably resulting in funding the further manufacture of the drug P.

Willing to compromise with terror maybe? We shall see...

Raid vs Blackflag who will win

The Trevmeister from OtherZeal smuggly gloats at the demise of more Tuhoe arrested today in continued police raids after the October 15 invasion of Tuhoe Sovereign Land by Crown forces.

Except what he doesn't know, and is about to know, is that this time they asked....yep, admitting that they completely fucked up last time, they used their local Maori Liaison officer, a Mr Wallace Haumaha to liaise with Tuhoe representatives to negotiate the hand over of the Ruatoki resident for arrest.

This resulted in the Ruatoki resident handing himself in earlier today at the Whakatane police station to be arrested and processed.

Wow what a big difference when you respect the sovereignty of the Tuhoe people, and the autonomous area they live in, instead of charging in there like silly SS storm troopers and whirling around in helicopters with snipers hanging out the sides trying to show who's boss.

This surely must be in Trevs mind, a compromise with terror? at least a compromise with the communist?

Sunday, February 17, 2008

Thomas Sowell on Left Wing Fascism-Is There Any Other Kind?

Other Loudon asserts himself to ask the hard question, is there any other kind of fascism? In his continued attempt to paint fascism and its many forms as the occupation of only left wing politics.

David G. Mills attempts to answer Loudons question in an article called:

It's the Corporate State, Stupid

From Information Clearings House

"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.

David G. Mills

11/10/04 "ICH" -- The early twentieth century Italians, who invented the word fascism, also had a more descriptive term for the concept -- estato corporativo: the corporatist state. Unfortunately for Americans, we have come to equate fascism with its symptoms, not with its structure. The structure of fascism is corporatism, or the corporate state. The structure of fascism is the union, marriage, merger or fusion of corporate economic power with governmental power. Failing to understand fascism, as the consolidation of corporate economic and governmental power in the hands of a few, is to completely misunderstand what fascism is. It is the consolidation of this power that produces the demagogues and regimes we understand as fascist ones.

While we Americans have been trained to keenly identify the opposite of fascism, i.e., government intrusion into and usurpation of private enterprise, we have not been trained to identify the usurpation of government by private enterprise. Our European cousins, on the other hand, having lived with Fascism in several European countries during the last century, know it when they see it, and looking over here, they are ringing the alarm bells. We need to learn how to recognize Fascism now.

Dr. Lawrence Britt has written an excellent article entitled “The 14 Defining Characteristics of Fascism.” An Internet search of the number 14 coupled with the word fascism will produce the original article as well as many annotations on each of the 14 characteristics of fascism that he describes. His article is a must read to help get a handle on the symptoms that corporatism produces.

But even Britt’s excellent article misses the importance of Mussolini’s point. The concept of corporatism is number nine on Britt’s list and unfortunately titled: “Corporate Power is Protected.” In the view of Mussolini, the concept of corporatism should have been number one on the list and should have been more aptly titled the “Merger of Corporate Power and State Power.” Even Britt failed to see the merger of corporate and state power as the primary cause of most of these other characteristics. It is only when one begins to view fascism as the merger of corporate power and state power that it is easy to see how most of the other thirteen characteristics Britt describes are produced. Seen this way, these other characteristics no longer become disjointed abstractions. Cause and effect is evident.

For example, number two on Britt’s list is titled: “Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights.” Individual rights and corporate rights, at the very least conflict, and often are in downright opposition to one another. In the court system, often individuals must sue corporations. In America, in order to protect corporations, we have seen a steady stream of rules, decisions and laws to protect corporations and to limit the rights of the individual by lawsuit and other redress. These rules, decisions, and laws have always been justified on the basis of the need for corporations to have profit in order to exist.

Number three on Britt’s list is the identification of scapegoats or enemies as a unifying cause. Often the government itself becomes the scapegoat when the government is the regulator of the corporations. Often it is lawyers or administrators who take on the corporations. Often it is liberals who champion the rights of individuals, or terrorists who might threaten state stability or corporate profit. Any or all may become scapegoats for the state’s problems because they pose problems for corporations.

Other notable characteristics of fascism described by Britt which are directly produced by corporatism are:

< The suppression of organized labor (organized labor is the bane of corporations and the only real check on corporate power other than government or the legal system);

< Supremacy of the military (it is necessary to produce and protect corporate profits abroad and threats from abroad);

< Cronyism and governmental corruption (it is very beneficial to have ex-corporate employees run the agencies or make the laws that are supposed to regulate or check corporations);

< Fraudulent elections (especially those where corporations run the machinery of elections and count the votes or where judges decide their outcomes);

< Nationalism (disdain for other countries that might promote individual rights);

< Obsession with national security (anti-corporatists are a security risk to the corporate status quo);

< Control of the media (propaganda works);

< Obsession with crime and punishment (anti-corporatists belong in jail); and

< Disdain for intellectuals and the arts (these people see corporatism for what it is and are highly individualistic).

All of these characteristics have a fairly obvious corporate component to them or produce a fairly obvious corporate benefit. Even Britt’s last two characteristics, the merger of state with the dominant religion and rampant suppression of divorce, abortion and homosexuality produce at least some indirect corporate benefit.

In sum, it’s the corporate state, stupid.

As I have pondered what could be done about America’s steady march toward the fascist state, I also have pondered what can be done internally to stop it. The Germans couldn’t seem to do it. The Italians couldn’t seem to do it. The only lesson from recent history where an indigenous people seemed to have uncoupled the merger of economic power with governmental power is the French Revolution. The soft underbelly of consolidated economic power is that the power resides in the hands of a few. Cut off the money supply of the few and the merger between economic power and government becomes unglued. The French systematically took out their aristocracy one by one. It was ugly; the French couldn’t seem to figure out when there had been enough bloodletting to solve the problem.

The thought of an American twenty-first century French Revolution is ugly. But the thought of an American twenty-first century fascist state is far uglier. It would be a supreme irony that the state most responsible for stopping worldwide fascism would become fascist 60 years later. But far worse than this irony is the reality that an American fascist state with America’s power could make Nazi Germany look like a tiny blip on the radar screen of history.

For some years now we have lived with the Faustian bargain of the corporation. Large corporations are necessary to achieve those governmental and social necessities that small enterprises are incapable of providing. The checks on corporate power have always been fragile. Left unchecked, the huge economic power of corporations corrupts absolutely. Most of the checks are badly eroded. Is there still time to get the checks back in balance? Or will we be left with two unthinkable options?

David G. Mills is an attorney who lives in Memphis, TN. Email -

Black History Month

Tribute to the greatest sportsperson...ever.

Thursday, February 14, 2008

Righties strategise how to close down Kotare Trust

It has come to our attention that the Kootarry Trust is teaching our offspring the ways of the Communist with the aid of public funding.

Trevor Loudon explains why it is up to the privately owned corporate media to do the job of shutting them down,

"It is not the job of political parties or governments to shut down private organisations."

"The media should be leading the charge to investigate Kotare's activities"

Operation Shutdown Kootarry was launched in a bid to manipulate and trigger media interest and to further garner a righty lead resistance movement against Kootarry's lefty manifesto, according to ultra right wing extremist Redbaiter,

"Unless there is real opposition to the Gramscian strategies of these people, unless there is some kind of real and powerful resistance, we're done."

Other anonymous comments appearing on Loudons blog further expose the intentions of Kootarry,

"What these people are doing is training up another generation of radicals to create a future tide of left-wing activism while watering down the terror styled crimes of their commie-raids. This has got to be stopped!" said one anonymous commentator.

The last thing we need in this country are youth being taught to think for themselves and make good politically aware judgments. Kootarry will not only free their minds from social engineering education system which tries to create working drones for big business's industries, but also create thinking minds set about to get off the grid and out of the system and that my pointed headed friends is communism and must be smashed!!!

So gather them chillins together, give them a good spanking as a show of love, and don't let the red man poison their minds with free thought. Free thought leads to communism, and communism leads to satan.